I’m sure by now you have heard about the horrific event in Dallas. Many people apparently killed and injured after gun fire rang out at a Black Lives Matter protest. Apparently for the first time ever, police used a robot to blow up the suspect of a crime.
[adinserter block=”3″]So please ask yourself. When did robots become judge, jury and trial?
I remember when police use to be considered as PEACE officers and would diffuse situations. What happen to negotiation and creating peace rather than hate? Why do police more times than not tend to escalate situations?
Now we are sending robots in to assassinate suspects? Oh, don’t tell me you trust the government and media to relay a 100% pure trust worthy story to the people? Don’t forget when they plastered the first suspect all over the news, then we found out later he actually handed his gun over to police right as the shooting happened. That was so evident they couldn’t hide it, so they needed another boogeyman. Did you forget about that?!
We don’t even know exactly how many bomb robots are being used by police around the country. The Pentagon’s 1033 program, which supplies military weapons and vehicles to law enforcement agencies across the country, distributed 479 EOD robots between 2006 and 2014, according to an NPR analysis.
According to a 2015 study by Bard College’s Center for the Study of the Drone, the Dallas County Sheriff’s Department bought one EOD robot in 2014 for $10,000. The FBI Dallas Division that year purchased loads of robots at the same per-unit cost, according to the study.
“We saw no other option but to use our bomb robot and place a device on its extension for it to detonate where the suspect was,” Dallas Police Chief David Brown told a news conference Friday. “Other options would have exposed our officers to grave danger. The suspect is deceased as a result of detonating the bomb.”
How do people not see something wrong with this here? We can’t be sending in robots to blow people up. This is tyranny! There are other ways to deal with suspects who are armed and dangerous. Again, what happen to negotiation? Police use to do it all the time in hostage situations and with potential suicide attempts.
Last year, the San Jose Police Department used one such robot — a Northrop Grumman Remotec Andros F6A — to deliver a phone and a pizza to an armed man on a freeway overpass, eventually talking him out of committing suicide.
After these current events in Dallas, you can bet media and government officials will be on the same page by telling people it’s justified due to the situation. Sadly, many people will look the other way and agree while slowly society keeps tightening the chains of slavery.
What happened was certainty tragic, but we can’t keep justifying someone’s stupid actions as a good reason to take freedom. Don’t leave out the fact that this could also be done by a corrupt government planning tragic events to instill fear and take freedom.
THE ANSWER?
Stand up for all rights! #AllRightsMatter
We can’t seriously be okay with government sending in robots to be the judge, jury and trial. These are the same people who got us 20 trillion in debt, 25% unemployment and all this corruption. Stop trusting them to be the answer to all our problems and stop trusting them to always be right. Question everything.
Be more like them ^^^^ !!
By Kory Watkins – DontComply.com
13 Comments
Pingback: Knowledge is Power | Police Are Using the Dallas Shooting to Go After Legal Open Carry
Carl Toersbijns
NOT THE FIRST TIME CHECK PHILADELPHIA cops used it and blew up a city block 1985 –
Cowboy Dan
That was aerial bombardment. They used a chopper, didn’t they?
Vinny Voodoo
Guy was an active shooter that had killed half a dozen people and wounded a dozen. He needed put down any way possible. Sneaking in with C4 was awesome… messy but awesome.
Michael Tefft
The man had just killed 5 police officers, was heavily armed, and was not going to be taken alive. The police were 100% correct in not risking any further loss of life. A bullet or a bomb, what’s the difference?
Tom Parsons
No different than a SWAT sniper shooting him. It was a great tactic that kept police out of the line of fire.
Shawn Wooster
I was outraged by this initially, but then I basically came to your conclusion.
polly
Well maybe if those crooked lowlifes cops didn’t shoot two guys one in his car doing what cop asked in front of a 4 year old little girl. And another one on the ground they could have easily handcuffed, but no they shot him point blank blank in the chest 4 times come up, thats the reason the Dallas cops are dead. Good bye to bad cops. They got what they deserved.. that’s my opinion.
Shawn Smith
Were the five killed in Dallas “bad cops”? Killing random people becasue you are upset with the actions of someone else who happens to wear the same uniform or has the same skin color does not make sense. You are justifying actions of violence and using events to rationalize the behavior. WRONG.
anthemcrier
Your comments are Nazi dude. If a truck driver killed my wife in New Jersey does that justify me sniping random truck drivers in Indiana?
Cowboy Dan
Polly, have you ever tried to handcuff a 300 lb. man? I have. It’s NOT easy, even if they’re NOT reaching for a gun with which to kill you.
RobertBrown1
What difference does it make whether a sniper takes him out, an officer runs toward him and shoots him, or a bomb is used? Deadly force was authorized…any deadly force. This wasn’t a duel with rules!
Michelle
Agree 100%! This completely blows my mind that people are justifying this murder! Insane! Based on what “they say he said”….we won’t ever know because no one else heard him!